Prenuptial Agreement in Family Law: Protecting Your Interests and Building a Strong Foundation
Entering a marriage is a joyous occasion filled with love and hope for a lifelong partnership. While it may not be the most romantic topic, discussing a prenuptial agreement (or prenup) is essential in safeguarding your interests and ensuring a secure future for both partners. In this blog post, we will explore the concept of prenuptial agreements in family law, their benefits, and why they are worth considering.
Concept of Prenuptial Agreement
A prenuptial agreement is a formal document that two people sign before marriage married. A prenuptial agreement's principal goal is to resolve financial concerns ahead of time. The agreements separate a person's debts and assets from their prospective spouse’s.
The agreements segregate a person's debts and assets from those of their future spouse. This agreement contains provisions for property distribution, investments, alimony, and any other monetary or possession-based agreements. The use of a prenuptial agreement is a novel notion. Marriage is regarded as a sacrament in India; hence the concept of a prenuptial agreement is frowned upon. There is no set format for a prenuptial agreement. The content of the prenuptial agreement varies from agreement to agreement because the couples determine it.
The content of the prenuptial agreement differs from agreement to agreement, as it depends upon the spouses. The entire concept of a prenuptial agreement is complicated in India. The primary purpose of the prenuptial agreement is to decide the outcome of finances and personal liabilities in the event of a failed marriage.
Benefits of a Prenuptial Agreement:
The validity of Prenuptial agreements under the Marriage Laws
In India, prenuptial agreements are not recognized or enforceable under the country's marriage laws. Indian society views marriage as a sacred union rather than a contractual agreement. Consequently, prenuptial agreements are not socially accepted in India, as the emphasis is placed on the spiritual bond between spouses rather than financial arrangements. Therefore, in the event of a marriage dissolution or separation, Indian law does not consider prenuptial agreements as a valid basis for determining issues such as alimony or child custody.However, as there is a Uniform Civil Code in Goa, it recognizes pre-nuptial agreements.
But all over India, to enforce a prenuptial agreement, it must meet the requirements of the Indian Contract Act 1872. This means that both spouses must voluntarily agree to the provisions outlined in the agreement and provide their consent without any external pressures or influences. If the consent is influenced by coercion, fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake, it is not considered free consent. To be enforceable, the prenuptial agreement should be unambiguous, and the clauses should be fair and equitable to both spouses. The court can recognise and consider such an agreement if these conditions are met.
In Pran Mohan Das v. Hari Mohan Das, a person agreed to marry a woman based on the promise of her father to gift a house to his daughter. After the marriage, the plaintiff’s father shifted the possession of the house through an unregistered gift. The couple-maintained possession of the house for several years and sold it to others. The wife’s father later sued to recover the house. Here, the Calcutta High Court held that the prenuptial agreement was good and valid, and the principle of “part-performance of a contract” estopped the plaintiff from recovering the property. Moreover, as the deal in question was not a marriage brokerage contract, it was not found to be opposed to public policy.
Conclusion
There is notable potential for creating prenuptial agreements that can address the specific needs of Indian couples. However, the lack of specific legislative guidance poses a significant obstacle to effectively utilizing these agreements in determining a marital relationship's complex dynamics. While prenuptial agreements have a contractual nature and can be partially considered under the provisions of the Indian Contract Act of 1872, it is unfortunate that the existing Indian personal law about such agreements is mainly inadequate. Therefore, it is suggested that serious consideration is needed regarding the regulation of prenuptial agreements, and once formulated, these regulations should be integrated into the Indian legal system.
Pran Mohan Das v. Hari Mohan Das, AIR 1925 Cal 856